IT Community Malaysia

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
IT Community Malaysia -> Salam Perkenalan -> Moving to usage-based pricing rather than the seat-based pricing: Worth the churn risk?
Post Info TOPIC: Moving to usage-based pricing rather than the seat-based pricing: Worth the churn risk?
community techzeel


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Date:
Moving to usage-based pricing rather than the seat-based pricing: Worth the churn risk?
Permalink  
 

We are also thinking of switching to a pay as you use model of usage, but I am terrified of the initial revenue shock and disorienting my existing customers. Is anyone within the community techzeel successful in doing this? How did you go about transitioning existing customers and not losing them?

 



__________________
lorem


Newbie

Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Date:
Permalink  
 

 Switching to a pay-as-you-use model is definitely a bold move, and it’s understandable to worry about an initial revenue dip or confusing your loyal customers. From what I’ve seen, successful transitions often involve phased roll-outs, clear communication about the benefits, and special pricing or grandfathered plans for existing users to ease the change. Hearing from others who’ve done this could be incredibly valuable. For anyone analyzing this from an academic perspective, looking into bestassignmentwriter.co.uk reviews might help with understanding how user feedback plays a role in adoption and trust during major product shifts.

 
 


-- Edited by lorem on Wednesday 4th of February 2026 02:35:50 PM

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
IT Community Malaysia -> Salam Perkenalan -> Moving to usage-based pricing rather than the seat-based pricing: Worth the churn risk?
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard